Summary
Blam Blam Blam, Neck Of The Woods, Auckland, Thursday August 29 REVIEW
GARY STEEL attends a Blam Blam Blam reunion gig and finds the power of their songs and performance is undiminished.
Blam Blam Blam was around for what now seems like a split second of time. In its short lifetime, the group made one 12-inch EP and a glorious debut album, Luxury Length, the recording of which must have strained the resources of its fledgling record company, Propeller. By the time of its release in 1982, I was already a huge fan, but after one listen to the album, โthe Blamsโ (as they were affectionately known) had become my favourite New Zealand band.
And then they were gone. Injuries sustained in a road accident saw to that.
I never expected it to happen, but 37 years later, here they are again, on a short reunion tour. Like so many reunions of bands from the โ80s itโs reasonable to expect that this is mostly about nostalgia; a chance to relive our youth through the music of one of the bands that mattered. But itโs so much more than that, because they were stopped in their tracks in 1982, when given the right circumstances they might have evolved and flourished. Instead, the Blams and their music is trapped in aspic, which makes it hellishly hard to really feel how important they were at the time, despite that great album as evidence. (I should point out, too, that Luxury Length was fucked with when released on CD and turned into a hodgepodge of extra tracks that destroys the original running order).
Iโm expecting an audience of 60-somethings and yes, probably half the audience tonight is in their late 50s or early 60s, but the other half is much younger and thatโs surprising, and itโs probably one reason that the applause isnโt quite as pumped up and enthusiastic as I would have expected it to be. (Well, I guess itโs hard to clap when youโve bought a $14 wine out of a can and you need both hands to hold the can and glass and thereโs nowhere to put them down).
Amazingly, the gig doesnโt feel at all like nostalgia. The trio of Mark Bell (guitars, voice), Tim Mahon (bass, voice) and Don McGlashan (percussion, euphonium, voice) looks middle-aged but plays with the vigour and kinetic energy of 20-year-olds. Back in โ82 but they werenโt quite this self-assured or determined to serve both the songs and the audience with such a superlative performance.
The music, in a sense, sounds very much of its time โ post-punk with that unique Kiwi accent that defines them. Itโs not quite so evident on record where the sound isnโt as pumped-up and bass heavy, but in concert you can hear in the music some of the groups from which they must have taken their inspiration, including Gang Of Four, but unlike those very serious English groups of the time, the Blams never tried to be cool. This is a key point, because most of the acts on the Flying Nun label (which was taking off at the same time as Blam Blam Blam) were from the too-cool-for-school aesthetic, influenced by Lou Reedโs famous nonchalance, and too often, it was camouflage for lack of chops. The Blams were satirists and they were funny and unafraid to be a bit nerdy. Heck, the drummer even farted away on a euphonium, for Christโs sake!
Does humour belong in music? Many find humour an uncomfortable bedfellow, but for those who donโt give a fuck about fake โcoolโ, the Blams were (and are) a revelation. In short, their set โ which included most of their small repertoire โ sounded nearly as vivid and vital as the day it was birthed, even if times have moved on and Muldoon and his draconian government isnโt in power and weโre not quite the police state that we seemed on the cusp of turning into at the time.
As I discuss on my monster-sized profile on Don McGlashan on AudioCulture, the assumption that Don was the leader and chief songwriter of Blam Blam Blam is wrong, and it was great to hear some of Mark Bellโs songs come alive on stage tonight. They may lack the finesse of McGlashanโs best pieces but they go a long way to defining the character of the group, in the sense of lyrics discussing the mores and morals of the time. But regardless of which member of the group wrote the songs theyโre all of a piece, and have clearly been written to fit a project with a specific agenda.
I got the feeling that a large section of the audience only really knew the well-known classics – โMarshaโ and โThere Is No Depression In New Zealandโ โ but itโs to the groupโs credit that they also excavated never-performed songs like the psychotic drum-machine madness of โRespectโ and possibly the greatest Don McGlashan song of all time, the spooky โCall For Helpโ.
While the trio is faithful to the original versions, itโs clear that they also feel enough freedom to have fun with them, and really, itโs the dedication to performance that makes this gig so special.
Those who have only seen Don McGlashan in a solo context or with his 1990s group The Muttonbirds are in for a shock. A true polymath, with the Blams itโs his drumming that astounds. Even with the knowledge of his early training in classical percussion itโs still a revelation to see the energy he puts into the unconventional (borrowed) kit and the skill with which he performs on it. Special mention, too, for Mark Bellโs superb guitar playing. Iโd always wondered how he managed such a distinctive mix and match between choppy rhythm work and beautiful strung-out melodic lines and solos, and I couldnโt help but wonder tonight why we havenโt heard more of his playing over the years. Perhaps heโs seldom found quite the right context?
In essence, although the return of the Blams had a smattering of nostalgia about it, this was really something else: the successful reanimation of a genius moment in time 37 years after the fact. And thatโs quite astonishing.
Postscript: Pity, then, about Neck Of The Woods. The stage is so low that to actually get a clear view of the performers at any one time I would have had to be wearing stilts; and because the room is so thin and long youโve really got to be near the sound desk to hear the music properly. Why go to a gig not to see a band? Why canโt Auckland do better than this? Itโs shameful. Whammy is even worse. Itโs interesting that on the NOTW website they blather on about it being a non-violent, gender-inclusive space, but what about having a space where customers can actually see and hear the band theyโve paid to see and hear? Iโm of average height but couldnโt see a thing. As for the $14 glasses of wine: this is not a premium space offering a premium experience, so why the premium prices?
This is a great review, Gary. I wasn’t at this gig but was the next night and concur with everything you say about the band. I hope they tour again. I had a chat to Tim Mahon and they were off to play the Paekakariki Hall the next night. I’d love to see them in that sort of venue.
Thanks, Mike. Yes, it would be great to see them in a conducive venue!